• the moving protostructure

    Par Guillaume Voisard, Hugo Cabaret, Stephen Bopeso, 22/12/18

    SCAFFOLDING :

        During the 2 weeks of scaffolding, we decided to form a group that was composed of Guillaume, Stephen and Hugo. We thought it would be interesting to work together because we all had some similar conditions, such as being at the edge of the water and the ground, or also Stephen and Hugo had projects that moved in different ways. 

    The first step was to think about a node inside a protostructure, that could move. Our first test was this one                                  Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)

      After making this test we realized that we needed to have a strong support to hold the bar in the middle. But instead of doing a similar node, we wanted to change the direction of our three axes to have an elegant node, and to do that we chose to imitate the orientation of each axes of guillaume's element, and then we began to build our protostructure. 

    Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)

    Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)


    Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)


        After making our double node at the scale 1:1, we had to work on how to put it on the site. So we worked on a system that could be fixed on the ground and that could hold our protostructure, and that allowed the movement that we made with this pivot. So we made 2 rails, one rail wich moves In the rail under it, so it has a movement in 2 directions

    Those rails are the link between the ground and the protostructure. 

        Then we made our protostructure at the scale 1:10 to see how we could multiply and link our nodes in every directions : 


    Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)Image Sat Dec 22 2018 15:02:33 GMT+0100 (CET)




















  • Planes : "point de fuite"

    Par Guillaume Voisard, 10/12/18

    Conceptualisation

     

    Notre élément a été, quant à la conceptualisation de "planes", crucial. En effet, c'est à partir de ce dernier qu'est né mon "planes".

    Il était important pour moi d'inscrire une certaine continuité à travers ces différents projets (measures, elements, planes).

     


    Image Mon Dec 10 2018 18:36:31 GMT+0100 (CET)




    Image Mon Dec 10 2018 18:36:31 GMT+0100 (CET)



    Point signifié

     

    Afin d'avoir une autre lecture de notre élément, j'ai décidé de ne pas matérialiser son point d'intersection mais de le signifier aux potentiels observateurs.

     

    Image Mon Dec 10 2018 18:45:06 GMT+0100 (CET)



    Plan horizontal

     

    Le plan horizontal que j’ai ajouté se situe, lui, juste au-dessus du niveau de l’eau. En effet, il agit, ici, comme une plateforme accessible au public.  

     

    Image Mon Dec 10 2018 18:45:06 GMT+0100 (CET)





    Parois verticales

     

    Voulant un objet plus tectonique que les précédents, j’ai fait fonctionner ces parois comme de véritables murs qui se réduisent au fur et à mesure de l’avancé du protagoniste en direction du « point de fuite » signifié, créant ainsi une certaine immersion.


    Image Mon Dec 10 2018 18:45:06 GMT+0100 (CET)




  • ELEMENTS: Volatil Symmetry

    Par Charles Darrousez, Guillaume Voisard, 21/10/18


    "Rien n'existe...



    Recherche de l'élément 

    Dans la recherche de notre élément nous nous sommes aidés de la symétrie, premièrement par dessin puis par le biais de construction en bois comme ci-dessous à l'échelle 1:3. La symétrie a été un outil fondamental pour nous dans l'exploration et la meilleure compréhension de nos mesures. Elle nous a permis de manipuler comme bon nous le semblait nos évaluations. 




                     Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale) 

    Structure intermédiaire composée par la forme et son inverse par un plan de symétrie horizontal   Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)


    Les dessins forment une dérive:




                                                                                          Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)  Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)        



    Conception de l'élément



    Cette étape-ci a été, pour nous, la plus compliquée dans sa réflexion. En effet, dans notre projet, aucune "évidence" liée à un élément existe. Chaque point, chaque hauteur, chaque longueur, chaque mesure est unique. De ce fait, et suite aux discussions avec Teresa, nous avons décidé de matérialiser (en plâtre, échelle 1:3) un point d'intersection. Ce point d'intersection se trouve sur l'axe de symétrie de la figure ci-dessus. Pour nous, cela nous a permis de faire le lien entre l'unique et le commun de notre figure. En effet, ce point est unique de par ses mesures et sa hauteur. Mais il est aussi commun aux autres car, comme chacun de nos points, il représente une intersection entre deux segments.


                        

                                            Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)




          Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)Image Mon Nov 26 2018 01:08:03 GMT+0100 (heure normale d’Europe centrale)


           

               ... sans son contraire"




  • MEASURES: Dérive sur le lac

    Par Charles Darrousez, Guillaume Voisard, 08/10/18



    PLAN

    Discovery of the site: Venoge


    Once arrived on the site, our attention was drawn to the rocks as their fragmentation, gaps and veins draw a multitude of paths to follow. It is this last aspect that we decided to dig in more in depth in this sequence measures. 

    Hence, the concept of the line or the path is therefore at the real basis of our work.


    Our next question was: what path should we follow? What rock should we choose? Why this one or another? 


    It is true that what is mainly interesting about the rocks (at least the one we chose) is that they are a physical limit separating the land and the water. This thin border acts as a contrast between two opposite and complementary components that make up the plan or spatial view of the Venoge: land and water. 


    This idea of contrast highly interested us. It is when we spotted a red piece of plastic standing nearby a rock and leaves emerging from its gaps that we decided that our line will not only follow the curves and the veins of the rock but also will be composed of points that express contrast between each other. 


    "Nothing exists without its opposite"

    -Chris Cutcher


                                                                                                

                Image Mon Oct 08 2018 20:25:48 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)                      Image Mon Oct 08 2018 20:25:48 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

                The place is situated near the lake,                         on the extremity of the beach


    Besides the contrast land-water and the one made by nature-artificial object, we decided to use the idea of direction and oppose the top of the rock and its bottom (up&down). This list became the process of establishing our line, starting from the artificial point, pursuing to the leaves, reaching the top, connecting the bottom to the lake and coming back onto the land. 

                                                              


                                                               Image Mon Oct 08 2018 20:25:48 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale) Human/artificial to Nature                                                     


                                         UP & DOWN     Image Mon Oct 08 2018 20:25:48 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)


       FIRST STEP

    Firstly, we decided to draw directly onto the rock what we wanted our line to look like. For this process, we used a rope, following the veins and reaching the points part of our criterias. 


          Image Mon Oct 08 2018 21:51:13 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

          The rope strides the veins...                                       ... follow the natural curves

                                                                                Image Mon Oct 08 2018 21:55:27 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

                                                        

        STEP 2

         Step 2 was about:

    • Choosing points on the rock, according to their meaning, position (along the curves) and heights. 
    • Placing a flat surface above the rock, parallel to the ground, to allow the measures to be taken from the top. 
    • Take the measures, heights, distances between the points, and report them on a notebook. 

       

                                Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:04:14 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

    STEP 3   

    With all of our ideas in our heads, measures reported, pictures taken, step 3 was a time of understanding our project, calculating the scales and drawing. 

    We came up with two drawings, one Monge's drawing of the measures taken from the flat surface above the rock, which means an inversed form of the rock. The other one is an unrolled section of the line, respecting the heights and distances, but in 2 dimensions rather than 3. 



                                     Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:14:26 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

        Monge's drawing of the inversed form of the rock

    Unrolled drawing of the line

      Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:28:15 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)


    STEP 4

    It is in this step that we did a mold of the unrolled version, obtained in the previous drawing.

    We chose to work with the scale 1:3.33

    Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:37:14 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

    This mold was the first try


    STEP 5

    Step 5 was surely the most difficult yet the most interesting part of the proccess. We built our mold, respecting the depths, the heights and the distances, according to the measures taken on the beach. To create a line, the shape obtained (surface between the points) was doubled. We therefore realized a reduction of the initial shape, to create a "wall", supporting by itself the line.


                               Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:47:08 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)


    To cover the in-between the two walls, we cut some triangles to adapt the different inclinaison to the different measures. Thus, all the pieces between the two walls, and between every points, are unique. 

    This part was particularly interesting as, unlike the first mold, we really got a true impression of the points we actually measured on the rocks; their heights, their relation in space, their depths compared to each other other, their means and complexity. 


    STEP 6

    Step 6 was for us the achievement of 3 weeks of work. After reinforcing each and every wall, each and every piece, after padding the exterior of our mold with coton, we finally filled our mold with plaster.


                   Image Mon Oct 08 2018 23:12:27 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)Image Mon Oct 08 2018 22:59:37 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

       View from above


                                                   Image Mon Oct 08 2018 23:12:27 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)


        View from the side

                         Image Mon Oct 08 2018 23:12:27 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

                                     Image Mon Oct 08 2018 23:12:27 GMT+0200 (heure d’été d’Europe centrale)

                                       The stains and imprefections we observed on the plaster were for

                           us a way to compare it with the imperfections and the marks present on the rock.